Worship Media Arts

Archive for Worship Media Copyright

How to Avoid “Popcorn Time” in Worship

 title=

Does your worship begin with “popcorn time”?

What is “popcorn time” you ask? Good question.

Before 1955, there was a reoccurring problem at the beginning of feature films. Much like today, films began with credits introducing the cast and eventually the title of each film. The problem was that opening titles were basically devoid of creativity. In fact, audiences and projectionists resented them.

Film producers went so far as to imprint a note on film reels requesting that the projectionist “pull curtains before title”, as they’d often wait until the main title came up to open the curtains to reveal the screen.

As you can imagine, audiences would typically wait until the opening titles were over to pay attention to what was happening on the screen. It created an environment where moviegoers would spend the first several minutes of a film buying and munching away on popcorn, until a film’s title was revealed and the narrative began.

This all changed when “The Man With the Golden Arm” came out in 1955. It began in what was then an unconventional/paradigm-shifting way, where the titles were done not just with text, but with moving graphic elements. Graphic artist Saul Bass created for that film what is now know as “the title sequence”.  You can see it here:

Simple by today’s standards, this title sequence ushered in a whole new method of storytelling that has continued on into today’s summer blockbusters.

Saul believed that the opening titles could be used to set a mood that would invite viewers in to the underlying core of a film’s story.  He saw opening titles as a metaphorical extension of a film’s narrative.

Bass described title sequences like this: “I saw the title as a way of conditioning the audience, so that when the film actually began, viewers would already have an emotional resonance with it.”

Read the rest of this entry » (1085)

2 Comments

Copyright: How Much is Enough part 2

¬?

obama_image

¬?

Just under a week ago I wrote about the image above and a news story that caught my eye regarding fair use and copyright law. You can read that post here.

Well it seems that the story is continuing to play out, and now the artist accused of violating the AP’s copyrighted photo has filed a lawsuit asking a judge to find that his poster did not violate copyright law. Read the latest article here.

Shepard Fairey and his lawyers maintain that he did not break copyright laws when he created the Obama Hope image (pictured above).

“Lawyers for Fairey acknowledged that the artist used the photograph. But they said he transformed the literal depiction into a “stunning, abstracted and idealized visual image that creates powerful new meaning and conveys a radically different message.”

No doubt the AP will strike back with it’s own countersuit at some point soon as this case will likely have a bearing on future cases regarding copyright law.
Read the rest of this entry » (778)

9 Comments